/linked/2017/02/03/14-week-quarter

Comments

anonymous:
How can you possibly be surprised that they Apple-washed over the truth?
10:52 pm — Friday, 3 February 2017
anonymous:
It was mentioned a couple of times in the Q&A. I'm surprised Gruber didn't read that when it came out.
10:54 pm — Friday, 3 February 2017
anonymous:
as stated, they did mention it in the conference call. it was a surprise to no one.

but don't worry, next q1, when they have a year over year decline, you'll hear all about it, and no mention of the 14 vs 13 week quarters.
11:37 pm — Friday, 3 February 2017
Grubby:
The fact that nearly all their products were in tight supply was factored in by analysts. They could have sold more, hence the increase in stock.
12:29 am — Saturday, 4 February 2017
To Be Fair:
> I'm surprised Gruber didn't read that when it came out.

Why are you surprised by that?
12:07 pm — Saturday, 4 February 2017
Sebby:
> How can you possibly be surprised that they Apple-washed over the truth?

Indeed, seems to be Apple's MO these days for solving all their ills, just bring out the PR people.
1:18 pm — Saturday, 4 February 2017
Grubby:
Again, do you really think the analysts don't have calendars?
4:58 pm — Saturday, 4 February 2017
Dicknose:
No one posting as Dicknose calling Dicknose a goat fucker yet?

DFWC is letting me down.
5:21 pm — Saturday, 4 February 2017
Dicknose:
Tim Cuck lied. What a fucking surprise.
10:55 pm — Saturday, 4 February 2017
Dicknose:
@Dicknose:

We hump goats.

Happy now?
6:30 pm — Monday, 6 February 2017
Leave a Comment
To leave a comment, install the Safari extension!