Gruber the Booger:
Marco touched on all of the Mac Pro bullet points well.

>That link is to my Macworld column from 7 years ago, which reads like it was written today:

Gruber was a pretty good writer back then.
11:30 pm — Wednesday, 19 April 2017
Gruber makes startling admission that he has neither evolved nor improved as a writer.

(I *generally* agree with Gruber, but he's not a particularly skilled writer)
5:49 am — Thursday, 20 April 2017
In a very crowded field, I find Arment to be the most smug, self-centered, full-of-himself toss-pot in the Apple comment-o-sphere. I tune out instantly.
9:23 am — Thursday, 20 April 2017
Gruber the Booger:

Marco posts irregularly, but marco.org with comments would be interesting.
3:02 pm — Thursday, 20 April 2017
piece of kit:
[Marco.org (with Comments) actually exists](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/marcoorg-with-comments/cippjmocbccgppcmamojpjeblgehngil): https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/marcoorg-with-comments/cippjmocbccgppcmamojpjeblgehngil
4:03 pm — Thursday, 20 April 2017
@piece of kit: You are awesome. For real Apple purists, there's a pointer to the Safari version here: https://katz.co/5461/
2:55 am — Friday, 21 April 2017
...except it doesn't do anything, on Safari at least.
2:58 am — Friday, 21 April 2017
it has to be versatile? It has to be pro?

but it has to be versatile? not a top or a bottom? Isn't that limiting the pro market?
10:21 am — Friday, 21 April 2017
The new Mac Pro has to be versatile?

Right now it seems pretty bottom. Can't it just be a top?

It needs to be less buttplug looking and more plug and play.
11:52 am — Wednesday, 26 April 2017
Leave a Comment
To leave a comment, install the Safari extension!