/linked/2017/05/10/win-win

Comments

2b1ask1:
A win win is when Gruber and his ilk distract us with this crap when a HUGE human trafficking ring is being exposed (and censored) as we speak.

Check it out for yourself:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1852247
12:49 am — Thursday, 11 May 2017
anonymous:
Maybe he expected this to be popular with Democrats because Democrats have spent months slamming Comey for snatching the election from the talons of Hillary?

And now they suddenly love him?
12:59 am — Thursday, 11 May 2017
To Be Fair:
>And now they suddenly love him?

Likewise Trump loved Comey a few months ago for his investigation of Hillary Clinton. Now he suddenly hates him?

Nobody loves Comey. But the circumstances of his firing are completely fucking insane and suspicious.
1:40 am — Thursday, 11 May 2017
anonymous:
Only suspicious if one believes in conspiracy theories about Russian hijacking of the election, of which zero evidence has been presented nor has a means even been suggested.

You'll have plenty to be pissed about when a permanent replacement for Comey is found. Save your indignation; you'll need it.
1:49 am — Thursday, 11 May 2017
My Optional Name:
>Only suspicious if one believes in conspiracy theories about Russian hijacking of the election, of which zero evidence has been presented nor has a means even been suggested.

Your Lord and Saviour Donald Trump loves him some conspiracy theories. Like the one about Obama wiretapping him, despite the complete lack of evidence for it.
3:14 am — Thursday, 11 May 2017
To Be Fair:
>Only suspicious if one believes in conspiracy theories about Russian hijacking of the election

Why would it need that to be suspicious? The fact that is happened so quickly out of the blue is reason enough. Along with many other reasons.

Anybody who doesn't think this is suspicious isn't paying attention.
3:27 am — Thursday, 11 May 2017
Gruber the Booger:
Although I am far from hating Trump with the fury of a thousand suns like Gruber does, no one in their right mind looks at this a "win-win" for Trump.

It smells and it reflects poorly on Trump.
11:45 am — Thursday, 11 May 2017
knowitall:
"Only suspicious if one believes in conspiracy theories about Russian hijacking of the election, of which zero evidence has been presented nor has a means even been suggested."

hahahahaa

what like someone on Trumps team (jeff Sessions) lying under oath that he didnt speak to the Russians?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/02/jeff-sessions-calls-for-resignation-claims-lies-russia

4:01 pm — Thursday, 11 May 2017
anonymous:
Clearly, he's just trolling the Democrats... most of whom seem struggling to react coherently.

Maxine Waters wants Trump impeached for firing Comey, but said would have supported Hillary Clinton doing the same thing.
4:36 pm — Thursday, 11 May 2017
anonymous:
LOL "muh russia" is going to be the end of the Democratic Party. Instead of focusing on jobs, or healthcare, or taxes, they're going to stake their whole identity on this vapor.
5:35 pm — Thursday, 11 May 2017
anonymous:
yes, vapor.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/us/politics/trump-russia-meeting-american-reporters-blocked.html
5:42 pm — Thursday, 11 May 2017
anonymous:
Vapor is right.

There's nothing troublesome in that New York Times article. You're hallucinating between the lines.
6:25 pm — Thursday, 11 May 2017
To Be Fair:
>There's nothing troublesome in that New York Times article.

No, nothing at all troubling about an administration that blocks independent American media from covering the activities of the White House, but instead allows Russian state-sponsored media to do it.

Nothing troubling at all.
6:50 pm — Thursday, 11 May 2017
anonymous:
1. The Russian brought a photographer.

2. Our media isn't independent.
8:24 pm — Thursday, 11 May 2017
To Be Fair:
>The Russian brought a photographer.

So, why was he allowed into the meeting, but American photographers weren't.

>Our media isn't independent.

Yes it is. American media isn't owned or controlled by the US government, like most Russian media is.

It's amazing how ignorant you Trump apologists are, but not surprising.
1:41 am — Friday, 12 May 2017
anonymous:
You have no idea what independent means.
3:01 am — Friday, 12 May 2017
Q*Bert:
> Only suspicious if one believes in conspiracy theories about Russian hijacking of the election, of which zero evidence has been presented nor has a means even been suggested.

Hmm. Yeah, I guess it's all just made up then.

[https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-intel-bosses-reiterate-russia-meddled-election-155658636.html](https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-intel-bosses-reiterate-russia-meddled-election-155658636.html)
3:24 am — Friday, 12 May 2017
Q*Bert:
> Maxine Waters wants Trump impeached for firing Comey, but said would have supported Hillary Clinton doing the same thing.

She's wrong, but that doesn't make Trump right.
3:29 am — Friday, 12 May 2017
My Optional Name:
>Yes it is. American media isn't owned or controlled by the US government, like most Russian media is.

It's the exact opposite here. Fox News controls the Republican government.
4:46 am — Friday, 12 May 2017
My Optional Name:
>Maxine Waters wants Trump impeached for firing Comey, but said would have supported Hillary Clinton doing the same thing.

Well if Clinton had won, at least she wouldn't have been under an active investigation if she had canned him on taking office.
4:50 am — Friday, 12 May 2017
anonymous:
FNC is all powerful and Hillary would have, for the first time ever, been held to account.

Jesus fucking Christ, My Optional Name. Who is your dealer?
5:38 am — Friday, 12 May 2017
To Be Fair:
>You have no idea what independent means.

OK genius, what does it mean?
7:00 am — Friday, 12 May 2017
Sebby:
@TBF, you're usually on target, but I think it's pretty clear the media represents a very narrow lens of business interests. You might watch [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjENnyQupow) and check out [this](http://medialens.org).

Certainly we don't have the Russian's vice-like grip over media, but we *do* have a clear and systematic abuse of power, extending to the media and therefore to furthering the narrow interests behind it.
10:13 am — Friday, 12 May 2017
My Optional Name:
>FNC is all powerful and Hillary would have, for the first time ever, been held to account.

>Jesus fucking Christ, My Optional Name. Who is your dealer?

Who's yours? Since it's clearly not obvious to you, Trump isn't pushing his own agenda. He's pushing Fox News' agenda. He relies on them for intel over his own fucking agencies. He considers all media to be fake... except Fox News. I guaran-fucking-tee you that if FNC issued a "political commentary" saying we should go to war with Russia, Trump would be trying to declare it by the end of the week.
2:00 pm — Friday, 12 May 2017
anonymous:
Plenty of evidence and means have been presented for the Russian hacking. You might as well be a flat Earther with that stupidity.
2:46 pm — Saturday, 13 May 2017
Leave a Comment
To leave a comment, install the Safari extension!